Re: DM-upload-allowed header for prboom (was Re: DM-upload-allowed)
2007/12/4, Vincent Fourmond <email@example.com>:
> Sorry I'm picking up right now, but I really think it should be in the
> SVN. What if, for instance, I have to make an emergency upload of one of
> the packages you're listed as DM uploader ? If the field is not in the
> SVN, it's likely that I will forget, and then, it will block you from
> doing any further uploads.
> What do you think about that ?
Yup, I've considered that too. As I don't really have an answer, and
until a consensus is reached about what to do, pros and cons, I've
just described my current praxis. I don't really have a strong opinion
for or against putting it in svn. To be honest, I'd really like to
have some policy in the Team about how to handle it. As far as I'm
concerned, the tag should be added in a per-package basis, not
globally to all the packages, but that should also be decided.
So, the proposal would be something like:
1) The tag should be added in a per-package basis, not globally to all
2) When the tag is added, it should be added to SVN
so, anything against this, someone?