Gerfried Fuchs wrote: > Hi! > > I stumbled upon some quite strange commits to the wesnoth part (and a > misleading reply to a bugreport) and investigated a bit further to have > found out that there were several strange commits going on, like changes > to debian/changelog changing an already released changelog entry and > name it in the commit message as "watchfile added". [..] > Sorry, I am only at not even 40% of that output and already need a > break. And please don't get it wrong, I don't say that he commited only > breakage, but the amount of it is simply overwhelming. Thanks for doing the review, even if this much. > I wonder how other people in the team see such things, if this is the > kind of quality we want the packages to be touched with. Kmos told me Definetly not. It looks like we need some form of ACL in SVN after all :-/ I'll try to find time for this (at least about documenting on this). > he won't touch wesnoth anymore - but that unfortunately doesn't change > the core problem of breaking stuff... > > Sorry for the length of the mail, but it's not like this is something > that I want or think I should keep to myself, if we want to work as a > team and deliver quality to our users. Thanks for pointing out these issues. -- Regards, EddyP ============================================= "Imagination is more important than knowledge" A.Einstein
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature