[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: RFS: hex-a-hop (updated package)



2007/9/10, Jens Seidel <jensseidel@users.sf.net>:
> Hi Bas,
>
> On Mon, Sep 10, 2007 at 09:55:31AM +0200, Bas Wijnen wrote:
> > I have some questions before uploading the package:
>
> first of all thanks for your review.
>
> > - You have specified "Priority: extra".  According to policy, "This
> >   contains all packages that conflict with others with required,
> >   important, standard or optional priorities, or are only likely to be
> >   useful if you already know what they are or have specialized
> >   requirements."  I would expect this to be optional.  Is there a reason
> >   that it isn't?
>
> Oops, I didn't changed this. Sam, you are probably the one who is
> responsible. Can you explain this? (Would it be OK for me to change
> this (after a carefully analysis this night) or do you feel responsible
> for this alone?)

In fact the main responsible for the package until now was me. I
convinced Sam to be added to Uploaders because, having contributed
with a patch, he knew enough of the package to understand it.

Go ahead and change it, no problem :)

Miry



Reply to: