Re: copyright files and GPL links
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Gerfried Fuchs wrote:
> If it would have different licences - which it doesn't: "GPLv2 or
> later" is not different licences, it is a choice we can make. We do
> have to list only that one choice. And if we would list v3 (through the
> symlink of we-don't-care) we are actively taking away that choice from
> our users - which according to our social contract should be coming
> first.
But you are contradicting yourself. "We do have to list only that one
choice" and "we are actively taking away that choice from our users".
By pointing to to v3 only, we are relicensing the work, and by pointing
to v2 only we are not providing full information.
I really think this is a false dilemma. Is is as simple as adding links
to both license files.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFGzF2zztOe9mov/y4RAtUzAKCyG8ox6H+SJUGjuTWP0I74MtUbvACfRxVI
aX/nBK8x7vjy9oWpZq6WmVI=
=Aq4t
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Reply to: