[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Bug#383316: [karuritosu@gmail.com: Re: Sectoid Frets on Fire tracks]

On Fri May 11 17:13, Miriam Ruiz wrote:
> > I have packaging for this now at
> > http://mjj29.matthew.ath.cx/fretsonfire-data-sectoid.debian.tar.gz,
> > which includes a get-orig-source target to create the source tarball.
> > I've also updated the fretsonfire packaging in svn to depend on it. I'll
> > add the sectoid packaging to svn if people agree with this approach
> I wonder if it would be better to just recommend it, instead on depending on
> it. We should also create some Provides: name for all the packages including
> FoF songs, i guess.

I think we should depend on some songs package. A also don't think we
need provides; would there be any reason _not_ to have the sectoid songs
installed? I don't see any need to introduce a virtual package here for

fretsonfire depends fretsonfire-data-sectoid
fretsonfire-data-* depends fretsonfire

and optionally

fretsonfire (recommends/suggests) fretsonfire-data-*

should be fine.

> We should also include the tutorial song somewhere, don't we?

I was intending this to be in the main fretsonfire package (as it is at
the moment).


Matthew Johnson
University of Cambridge PhD Student

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Reply to: