On Sat, 2006-09-23 at 19:34 +0100, Jon Dowland wrote: G'day Jon, > > We therefore need a pair of virtual packages. > > I propose doom-wad is kept and used to mean "a vanilla-doom > compatible IWAD" and a new boom-wad virtual package is added > to describe an IWAD which requires boom. This would require > the following changes: > > prboom changed so that > Depends: freedoom | doom-wad | boom-wad > > lxdoom also. I/we need to talk to Joe Drew about lxdoom. > It's not a games-team package atm, it could be, but afaik it > is pretty much supersceded by prboom upstream. > > freedoom changed so it Provides: boom-wad > > no changes to doom-wad-shareware (not a games-team package) > no changes to chocolate-doom, edge, jdoom > > I'd also have to set Conflicts: so that packages were > upgraded lock-step. > > Any objections? I'll implement the changes and build new > packages, and update doom-packaging with the new guidelines > within the next few days. > No objections from me (the deng packager/upstream). It will be a long while before we have full boom support, and I do get tired of the bug reports that it doesn't work with freedoom correctly. Regards, Yagisan -- Jamie Jones Proprietor E-Yagi Consulting ABN: 32 138 593 410 Mob: +61 4 16 025 081 Email: eyagi.consulting@gmail.com Web: http://www.eyagiconsulting.com GPG/PGP signed mail preferred. No HTML mail. No MS Word attachments PGP Key ID 0x4B6E7209 Fingerprint E1FD 9D7E 6BB4 1BD4 AEB9 3091 0027 CEFA 4B6E 7209
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part