Re: Sarge+1: ideas for Experimental V1.2 (or is that 0.2?)
* Goswin von Brederlow (brederlo@informatik.uni-tuebingen.de) [030828 13:20]:
> Andreas Barth <aba@not.so.argh.org> writes:
> > Really? The latest glibc in sarge is from 2003-03-22, and there are
> > currently 1103 packages waiting for glibc.
> What has that got to do with anything?
This was the part of the mail were we discussed about binary
distribution. For this this is a valid argument. For source-only of
course not, as I always said.
> For on-the-fly compiling a chroot is pretty much a must in my opinion.
It would certainly be a valuable contribution to provide a package
that makes back-compilation easier. But we shifted the goal more than
just a bit.
Cheers,
Andi
--
http://home.arcor.de/andreas-barth/
PGP 1024/89FB5CE5 DC F1 85 6D A6 45 9C 0F 3B BE F1 D0 C5 D1 D9 0C
Reply to: