Re: NM non-process

[Tollef Fog Heen <tfheen@raw.no>]

* Matthew Palmer 

| On Wed, Aug 06, 2003 at 11:10:08AM +0200, Tollef Fog Heen wrote:
| > * Adam Majer 
| > 
| > | My definition of MIA for DD: Doesn't fix release critical bugs for
| > | his/her package(s) within a week or two and doesn't respond to
| > | direct emails about those bugs.
| > 
| > I guess I'm MIA, then, since I have an RC bug which is 156 days (or
| > so) old, which is waiting for upstream to rewrite the program.
| 
| Is that noted in the log for the bug? 

Naturally, yes.

| Or would you respond to an e-mail enquiring as to the status of the
| bug?

Yes.

| If either of those is true, then you're not MIA by Adam's definition
| (well, I added the bug log bit, but it's pretty much a pre-emptive
| answer to the question "what's going on with that bug?").

I misread, I read the «and» as an «or», which changes the semantics a
bit. :)

-- 
Tollef Fog Heen                                                        ,''`.
UNIX is user friendly, it's just picky about who its friends are      : :' :
                                                                      `. `' 
                                                                        `-