Re: NM non-process
On Wed, Aug 06, 2003 at 11:10:08AM +0200, Tollef Fog Heen wrote:
> * Adam Majer
>
> | My definition of MIA for DD: Doesn't fix release critical bugs for
> | his/her package(s) within a week or two and doesn't respond to
> | direct emails about those bugs.
>
> I guess I'm MIA, then, since I have an RC bug which is 156 days (or
> so) old, which is waiting for upstream to rewrite the program.
Is that noted in the log for the bug? Or would you respond to an e-mail
enquiring as to the status of the bug? If either of those is true, then
you're not MIA by Adam's definition (well, I added the bug log bit, but it's
pretty much a pre-emptive answer to the question "what's going on with that
bug?").
- Matt
Reply to: