On Sun, Jun 15, 2003 at 07:59:15AM -0500, Manoj Srivastava wrote: > On Sun, 15 Jun 2003 14:17:23 +0200 (CEST), Santiago Vila <sanvila@unex.es> said: > > In this case you should point your MUA to mail.upv.es. > > If they leave mail.upv.es as an open relay and you get blocked > > because of this, you should complain to postmaster at upv.es, not to > > whoever blocked you. > In the meanwhile, you, an innocent, would have become > collateral damage, and your non-spam mail would still be rejected by > those who blindly trudst thr RBL. And it is very likely they do not > care. > I find that unacceptable, myself. Given that it's been pointed out that the MTA supports per-user bouncing of mail from open relays, and that it's very possible to use LDAP to provide easy management of per-user preferences, why is there any need to continue discussing what individual developers do or don't consider acceptable for collateral damage? -- Steve Langasek postmodern programmer
Attachment:
pgpTYua5ffqeP.pgp
Description: PGP signature