Re: RFC: fewer vim variants
On Sat, Jun 14, 2003 at 12:43:58PM -0700, Luca Filipozzi wrote:
> I propose to have only the following:
> vim (aka vim-tiny; no interpreters, no docs)
> kvim (including all non-threaded interpreters; kde support; no docs)
> gvim (including all non-threaded interpreters; gtk2 support; no docs)
> vim-doc
Can you list the "non-threaded interpreters"? I know debian's perl is
built with thread support and I would hate to do without :perldo.
Come to think of it, all libraries should at least be compatible with
threads according to policy 11.2.
What is the issue with threaded interpreters and vim?
--
Bart.
Reply to: