Re: RFC: fewer vim variants
On Sat, Jun 14, 2003 at 12:43:58PM -0700, Luca Filipozzi wrote:
> I propose to have only the following:
> vim (aka vim-tiny; no interpreters, no docs)
> kvim (including all non-threaded interpreters; kde support; no docs)
> gvim (including all non-threaded interpreters; gtk2 support; no docs)
> vim-doc
Will there please be a version without any Gnome dependencies? Many people
want to have GTK2, but see no reason to have to install all the Gnome
cruft.
At least I sure don't.
You imply this will be the case, but I'd like to know for sure.
--
Marc Wilson | The strong give up and move away, while the weak
msw@cox.net | give up and stay.
Reply to: