Re: Every spam is sacred
On Thu, 12 Jun 2003, Santiago Vila wrote:
> We were not so "innocent" back last year when
>
> a) spam was 10% of all the mail in the lists.
> b) we stripped all Received: headers, causing the mail to be seen as sent by
> us, not by the spammers who sent posts to the lists (this is now fixed).
>
> This caused us to be included in the spamcop blocking list, which use
> a rather poor criteria to list IPs.
>
> I'm *not* advocating for the use of the spamcop blocking list.
> In which other DNSBL were we listed and why were we listed?
As the service provider(Brainfood) for master(@debian.org emails) and
murphy(@lists.debian.org), this annoyed us to no end. I'm glad things have
improved on the debian side.
Reply to: