Re: Bug#190038: libgtkdatabox_1:0.2.3.0-1(m68k/unstable/thing2): FTBFS on m68k
- To: Debian Development <debian-devel@lists.debian.org>
- Subject: Re: Bug#190038: libgtkdatabox_1:0.2.3.0-1(m68k/unstable/thing2): FTBFS on m68k
- From: Junichi Uekawa <dancer@netfort.gr.jp>
- Date: Sat, 17 May 2003 01:21:15 +0900
- Message-id: <[🔎] 87ptmi981w.wl@netfort.gr.jp>
- In-reply-to: <20030430155227.GA19620@finlandia.infodrom.north.de>
- References: <Pine.LNX.4.43.0304222109070.17721-100000@wr-linux02.rki.ivbb.bund.de> <87fzo6m12l.wl@netfort.gr.jp> <20030430155227.GA19620@finlandia.infodrom.north.de>
> > It's strange, because on my i386 system
> > objdump -T /usr/lib/libgdk-X11-2.0.so gives
> >
> > 0002e71c g DF .text 00000049 Base _gdk_display_x11_get_type
> > 00045ebc g DF .text 0000014c Base _gdk_windowing_window_init
> > 0005017c g DF .text 00000106 Base XineramaIsActive
> > 00010a20 g DF .init 00000000 Base _init
> > 0002b8b0 g DF .text 00000041 Base gdk_image_type_get_type
> > 00050284 g DF .text 000001ba Base XineramaQueryScreens
> > 00000000 DF *UND* 000000c3 g_get_charset
> > 00026e3c g DF .text 00000097 Base _gdk_screen_close
> >
> > and that probably means the symbol should be defined within that library.
>
> On crest (m68k) this results in:
>
> 00000000 D *UND* 00000000 XineramaIsActive
> 00016970 g DF .init 00000000 Base _init
> 0002ffd4 g DF .text 0000004c Base gdk_image_type_get_type
> 00000000 D *UND* 00000000 XineramaQueryScreens
> 00000000 DF *UND* 000000c6 g_get_charset
> 0002b8fa g DF .text 0000009a Base _gdk_screen_close
> 00000000 DF *UND* 00000148 XkbSetDetectableAutoRepeat
>
> Any idea why it seems to be undefined (*UND*) on m68k?
Noone seems to have replied to this mail yet, but
for this kind of thing to happen, a possible cause would be
a XineramaQueryScreens function that is expected to be
defined in a static library (and linked into the
shared library) was once provided as a shared library.
libXinerama.a is only provided as a static library,
but apparently, on m68k, I suspect some symbols were provided
through some shared library, at some time.
regards,
junichi
Reply to: