Re: pkgdump
On Fri, Jan 10, 2003 at 02:47:55AM +0200, Halil Demirezen wrote:
> >
> > But "pkgdump" is not good -- it sounds like a packaging tool, not a
> > network tool. I think there is a translation problem:
> >
> > package = a collection or archive of software or files
> > packet = a chunk of network data
> >
> > I think you might want to use something like "packet*" or "pkt*" for
> > the name. Check google for conflicts.
>
> Thanks for this warning.
> I think i got confused because of our native language.
> we use both package and packet in the same way.
I understand.
> so I'd rather use pktdump instead of pkgdump?
http://www.google.com/search?q=pktdump shows several existing
utilities by that name. A better idea might be "pktreport" -- no
conflicts.
Steve
--
Steve Traugott
Speaker Coordinator, Silicon Valley Linux Users Group
http://www.svlug.org
--
UNIX/Linux Infrastructure Architect, TerraLuna LLC
stevegt@TerraLuna.Org
http://www.stevegt.com
Reply to:
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: pkgdump
- From: Halil Demirezen <halild@bilmuh.ege.edu.tr>
- References:
- pkgdump
- From: Halil Demirezen <halild@bilmuh.ege.edu.tr>
- Re: pkgdump
- From: Steve Traugott <stevegt@TerraLuna.Org>
- Re: pkgdump
- From: Halil Demirezen <halild@bilmuh.ege.edu.tr>