Re: Shouldn't desktop environments use *term -ls? (Re: The best recommendation [...])

To: Brian May <bam@snoopy.apana.org.au>
Cc: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: Shouldn't desktop environments use *term -ls? (Re: The best recommendation [...])
From: Bernd Eckenfels <lists@lina.inka.de>
Date: Sat, 13 Jul 2002 02:11:36 +0200
Message-id: <[🔎] 20020713001136.GA9342@lina.inka.de>
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 1026515795.3650.26.camel@scrooge>
References: <[🔎] Pine.LNX.4.21.0207120016050.24014-100000@figaro.localnet> <[🔎] 1026515795.3650.26.camel@scrooge>

On Sat, Jul 13, 2002 at 09:16:34AM +1000, Brian May wrote:
> I suspect (but haven't checked) in some window managers that PAM
> authentication occurs in a separate process (like the new feature in
> sshd).

Personally I sispect window managers do no authentication at all.

Greetings
Bernd


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-request@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org

Reply to:

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Shouldn't desktop environments use *term -ls? (Re: The best recommendation [...])
  - From: Brian May <bam@snoopy.apana.org.au>

References:
- Re: Shouldn't desktop environments use *term -ls? (Re: The best recommendation [...])
  - From: Manfred Wassmann <debian-devel@NCC-1701.B.Shuttle.de>
- Re: Shouldn't desktop environments use *term -ls? (Re: The best recommendation [...])
  - From: Brian May <bam@snoopy.apana.org.au>

Prev by Date: Re: dir permissions
Next by Date: Re: Shouldn't desktop environments use *term -ls? (Re: The best recommendation [...])
Previous by thread: Re: Shouldn't desktop environments use *term -ls? (Re: The best recommendation [...])
Next by thread: Re: Shouldn't desktop environments use *term -ls? (Re: The best recommendation [...])
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread