Re: lightning quick woody+1 release scenarios (was Re: Wishlist for woody+1)
Junichi Uekawa writes:
> On Mon, 27 May 2002 09:13:46 +0200
> Matthias Klose <doko@cs.tu-berlin.de> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> > > So no gcc 3.1, no new KDE or Gnome (which I would assume would have a large
> > > impact on the tasks), no new dpkg.
> >
> > no gcc-3.1 would mean to stick with an old over three year old
> > compiler which doesn't get the attention and bug fixes that gcc-3.1
> > gets.
> >
> > with gcc-3.1 we'll get a compiler common across all our
> > architectures, which will make life a lot easier.
>
> Has gcc-3.1 got enough testing ?
hurd uses 3.1 as the default compiler, look at the bug reports for
3.1, but you won't get any testing, if you don't use it. Report bugs
in gcc-3.1 NOW, so that they can be fixed in a 3.1.x
release. regressions compared to 2.95 and 3.0 have high priority
upstream, so it's likely they can be fixed in 3.1.x.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-request@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
Reply to: