[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Gnome & /usr/local policy



I believe GNOME 2 fixes the problem - each app specifies it's own prefix
to the gnome_init (or equiv), this is searched as well as the prefixes
for the libraries...

http://developer.gnome.org/dotplan/porting/ar01s06.html

Ian.

On Wed, 2001-11-28 at 14:36, Jules Bean wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 28, 2001 at 09:27:04AM -0500, Justin Hahn wrote:
> > IIRC, this is a known problem in GNOME. I filed a bug on this with them back
> > in the pre-1.0 days and they marked it as won't fix. A bug relating to this
> > is probably still in their bug tracker. They don't seem to care much.
> > 
> > IIRC, it's because the prefix gets hard coded into the GNOME libraries. It's
> > quite ugly actually.
> 
> If you're right, this sounds like an excellent opportunity for Debian
> to do the Right Thing (tm) even though upstream doesn't.
> 
> So we just need someone to go and root out all the hard-coded paths
> and replace them with hardcoded path-*lists*... and then we'll be able
> to pass the compile options to make sure /usr/local/foo is in there
> whenever /usr/share/foo is.
> 
> Volunteers?
> 
> Jules
> 
> 
> -- 
> To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-request@lists.debian.org
> with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
> 
> 
-- 
Ian Campbell

So many men, so many opinions; every one his own way.
		-- Publius Terentius Afer (Terence)



Reply to: