On Mon, Aug 27, 2001 at 03:55:28PM -0600, John Galt wrote: > On Mon, 27 Aug 2001, Marcelo E. Magallon wrote: > > >[ woa, evil Mail-Followup-To you've got there -- or did you really want > > no replies back to the list? ] > > No, Just CC'd along with the list: m-c-t is apparently not the right way, > and reply-to can get munged. We have another arbitrary situation: how do > the people that want replies CC'd to them exist peacefully with people who > don't? mutt seems to handle this use of Mail-Followup-To: for list-reply correctly; it replies to the list, which is what list-reply is supposed to do, but Cc:s the target in Mail-Followup-To. If you really don't want replies back to the list, set Reply-To. Nothing wrong with setting Mail-Copies-To: yourself as well, though, to make it clear to those with broken MUAs. And any comments you feel like making in X-* headers. -- .''`. ** Debian GNU/Linux ** | Andrew Suffield : :' : | Dept. of Computing, `. `' | Imperial College, `- http://www.debian.org/ | London, UK
Attachment:
pgpYlYYt_lRCW.pgp
Description: PGP signature