Re: testing is broken
Wichert Akkerman <wichert@cistron.nl> writes:
> Previously Thomas Bushnell, BSG wrote:
> > Yes, so let's fix it!
>
> No, apt-get was meant as a debuging tool, not as a full frontend
> to libapt.
Well, I think that it's about time to change the rationale behind
apt-get, then. If it hadn't been for apt-get, I'd most probably still
be running mainly Red Hat and LinuxPPC. (Now that I know Debian a
bit, I wouldn't want to go back, even if it meant doing wget+dpkg.)
Before, I tried going Debian several times, but dselect made be
quickly back out again. Just fyi.
Jan.
--
Jan Nieuwenhuizen <janneke@gnu.org> | GNU LilyPond - The music typesetter
http://www.xs4all.nl/~jantien | http://www.lilypond.org
Reply to: