Re: RFC: new update-inetd
On Mon, Apr 02, 2001 at 03:07:22PM -0600, John Galt wrote:
> >Well telnetd should be loverd. Just my opinion though. I never use
> >it on any system personally.
>
> But it's replacement (ssh) is not capable of being priority standard in
> main.
Well... I do not understand this. Why should telnetd be there in
the first place? It is seldom needed especially for hosts that
should not be administrated remotely.
But if this a common option I do surrender :)
Regards,
// Ola
--
--------------------- Ola Lundqvist ---------------------------
/ opal@debian.org Björnkärrsgatan 5 A.11 \
| opal@lysator.liu.se 584 36 LINKÖPING |
| +46 (0)13-17 69 83 +46 (0)70-332 1551 |
| http://www.opal.dhs.org UIN/icq: 4912500 |
\ gpg/f.p.: 7090 A92B 18FE 7994 0C36 4FE4 18A1 B1CF 0FE5 3DD9 /
---------------------------------------------------------------
Reply to: