Re: RFC: new update-inetd
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On Mon, 2 Apr 2001, Ola Lundqvist wrote:
>On Mon, Apr 02, 2001 at 02:38:58PM +0200, Josip Rodin wrote:
>> On Mon, Apr 02, 2001 at 03:25:18PM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote:
>> > Package: netkit-inetd
>> > Priority: optional
>>
>> Just a small note: since stuff like telnetd has the standard priority, one
>> of the internet-superserver-providing packages needs to have the same
>> priority, or the priority of telnetd (and possibly other packages) needs to
>> be lowered.
>Well telnetd should be loverd. Just my opinion though. I never use
>it on any system personally.
But it's replacement (ssh) is not capable of being priority standard in
main.
>Regards,
>
>// Ola
>
>
- --
The early worm gets the bird.
Who is John Galt? galt@inconnu.isu.edu, that's who!
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: PGP for Personal Privacy 5.0
Charset: noconv
iQA/AwUBOsjqEh9mehuYcOjMEQKvVQCdFYS5uNcr6muJyj7MKIWkWjYa+rsAoKEs
GgmgFdGgSfgR2ItTxv1ciIMz
=u9h/
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Reply to: