Le 08/12/2014 00:16, Francesco Poli a écrit : > >> A questions though : >> Could you comment on the rationale for keeping the old license − all the >> « used to be released under the following terms » section ? >> Does it give any better license compatibility ? > Yes, it does. It avoids the license incompatibility issues of the > previous GPL-v2-only themes which are based on the Debian "Open Use" > Logo (without the "Debian" label). See for instance the Joy theme... > Well, actually Joy was updated to GPLv3 but the copyright file is outdated… https://wiki.debian.org/DebianArt/Themes/Joy So more questions : - would switching Joy to GPLv3 in the copyright file be fine or would it create more problems ? I would guess the answer is « yes it’s fine » because all other materials mixed with this theme are GPLv2 / GPLv2+ but confirmation is still welcome. - do we also need GPLv2 for any reason ? - I guess even if switching Joy to GPLv3, we still need the old Debian logo copyright for older themes under GPLv2 ? I applied the patch and added Joy -> GPLv3 and Lines -> GPLv2+ Please check. Kindly, --Aurélien
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature