[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Release Team Sprint Results



On mer., 2014-12-03 at 22:06 +0100, Francesco Poli wrote:
> [...]
> | > For the scripted / XML parts it’s all based on Joy and former work
> and
> | > can be published under the same license(s).
> | > The KDM icons are from Joy also.
> | > The main artwork is already stated as CC-BY 3.0 by Juliette on the
> wiki.
> [...]
> 
> Now, as stated on the debian/copyright file of the desktop-base
> package:
> 
> [...]
> | The Joy theme is © 2012 Adrien Aubourg and released under the GPLv2
> | license.
> [...]
> | The Joy plymouth script is Copyright © 2009 Canonical Ltd.,
> | Copyright © 2010 Aurélien COUDERC and Copyright © 2012 Jonathan
> Carter under
> | the GPLv2+.
> [...]
> | The Joy KDM  theme is © 2012 Eshat Cakar and © 2010 Roman Shtylman
> GPLv2
> | with artwork from Adrien Aubourg under the GPLv2 license.
> [...]
> 
> [quoted from
> https://tracker.debian.org/media/packages/d/desktop-base/copyright-8.0.0~exp1
> ]
> 
> The question is: how can the Lines theme be released under CC-by-v3.0,
> when it's in part based on material available under GPL-v2 ?

The Lines theme (by Juliette) is CC-BY 3.0. I guess you talk about the
derived work (the KDM theme)?

> These two licenses are notoriously incompatible with each other.

Aren't you confusing with CC-BY 2.0?
> 
> I think that Juliette Belin should be asked to re-license the Lines
> theme under the terms of the GNU GPL v2.
> Or, at least, to dual-license it.

Maybe you forgot to add her to the mail recipients, then?
> 
> > 
> > > Moreover, are some (or all) of these proposed themes going to be
> > > included in the desktop-base package?
> > > Or just the "chosen one"?
> > 
> > Just the chosen one
> > 
> > We have wanted multiple theme packages in Debian for a long time but
> > it hasn't happened yet.
> [...]
> 
> That's unfortunate. Things like boot loader or display manager themes
> should be made easy to choose for the system administrator...
> 
Your help is really welcome for Stretch, I think. A lot of people seem
to want that feature, but so far none of them actually implemented it.
-- 
Yves-Alexis

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part


Reply to: