On Tue, Nov 02, 2010 at 02:55:31PM +0100, Didier 'OdyX' Raboud wrote:
> (Context: while hunting for an RC bug to fix, I fell on #587668 and then asked
> for advice on #debian-release, where a discussion was held. Here's my summary of
> the issue.)
Hi Didier,
I stumbled upon these bug logs myself during last week-end. IANAL, but
FWIW my own summary of the issue is the same as yours, thanks for saving
my time in posting it here yourself first :-)
Let me just comment on a specific option, which lays pretty much at the
intersection of SPI/DPL responsibilities.
> d) get the DOUL-with license changed in time for Squeeze,
I've been looking into this option, as I would have loved to simply
propose "let's re-license the 'with' logo under DOUL". Unfortunately,
there are concerns that doing so could be interpreted as "naked
licensing" [1] the Debian trademark. I still hope to find some
DFSG-free way out of it, but the issue looks tricky and I seriously
doubt it can be solved in time for Squeeze.
Cheers.
[1] http://itlaw.wikia.com/wiki/Naked_license
--
Stefano Zacchiroli -o- PhD in Computer Science \ PostDoc @ Univ. Paris 7
zack@{upsilon.cc,pps.jussieu.fr,debian.org} -<>- http://upsilon.cc/zack/
Quando anche i santi ti voltano le spalle, | . |. I've fans everywhere
ti resta John Fante -- V. Caposella .......| ..: |.......... -- C. Adams
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature