> But there are still some open question that are worth a discussion. On > of the main concepts of g-a-i is to make enabling additional and third > party repositories as easy as possible. But do we want this in Debian? I think we should do this. > The application data will be separated into three packages: > app-install-data-debian-main, app-install-data-debian-contrib and > app-install-data-non-free. the number of .desktop files in contrib and non-free is too low > 1. The Ubuntu way: Shipping the data for all applications of main, > contrib and non-free by default, excluding the icons, using filters to > select the level of freedom and defaulting to only show applications of > main. The filters could be the following: > > all applications (main, contrib, non-free), only Free Debian > applications (main), only installed applications > > (we don't need to promote third party applications and we do not support > non-free applications) This seems to be the right way. > Finally there is still one open dependency: sexy-python. Since the ITP > holder does not respond to mails it would be nice if anybody else could > upload it. I have a package at jak-linux.org, see http://jak-linux.org/.tmp/sexy-python_0.1.9-1.dsc -- Julian Andres Klode IRC Nickname: juliank (Debian/OFTC + Freenode) Fellow of FSFE: https://www.fsfe.org/en/fellows/jak (No. 1049) Debian Wiki: http://wiki.debian.org/JulianAndresKlode Ubuntu Wiki: http://wiki.ubuntu.com/JulianAndresKlode In Launchpad: https://launchpad.net/~juliank Packages Overv: http://qa.debian.org/developer.php?login=jak@jak-linux.org Languages: German, English, [bit French]
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature