On Mon, 2017-06-05 at 23:12 +0200, Stéphane Blondon wrote: > No, because I didn't find what to ask specifically. I thought I was fairly specific in the mail where I suggested the mails, I would be happy to clarify if needed. https://lists.debian.org/debian-www/2017/01/msg00163.html The mail you sent was a single thread cross-posted to many lists, instead of multiple individual threads addressing the specific items, posted to the specific lists relevant to the items. https://lists.debian.org/debian-www/2017/02/msg00006.html https://lists.debian.org/debian-www/2017/02/msg00005.html > I wrote new paragraphs and add some info in older ones. > The result is displayed at > http://stephane.yaal.fr/tmp/derivatives-page/Debian%20--%20Debian%20derivatives.html The changes look mostly reasonable, I'll fix the issues I can see once you have committed your changes to the website, please do that soon. > I wonder if it's a good idea. It's probably a good idea but where is the > limit if in the future other derivative requests to be added to the list? > > If we add the list, I would suggest Ubuntu (probably the most famous > derivatives) and Tails. We should not add any list of derivatives to the website until there has been a Debian-wide discussion about whether we should list derivatives on the website and if so, the criteria for this listing, and the addition/removal processes, as I suggested in my earlier mail: https://lists.debian.org/debian-www/2017/01/msg00163.html BTW, some posts that might be interesting to read before starting the discussion about which derivatives to list: https://lists.debian.org/debian-www/2014/05/msg00063.html https://lists.debian.org/debian-derivatives/2012/01/msg00005.html -- bye, pabs https://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part