On Wed, 31 Aug 2011 14:43:06 +0200 Stefano Zacchiroli <zack@debian.org> wrote: > On Wed, Aug 31, 2011 at 01:23:59PM +0100, Paul Wise wrote: > > This one only applies to 2 derivatives (LMDE, Voyage), I guess in > > future I shouldn't bother the list with issues that only apply to a > > few distributions? > > On the contrary, I find them useful nonetheless. What I'm missing in I agree with Stefano and Didier here - its definitely useful to see the mails, and a count of how many are affected would be quite interesting (if easy to produce). > the notifications to the list is the number of affected derivatives, > or even their names (unless it's perceived as "too shame-y" > mentioning them here). However, I guess that it'll be a burden for Not sure distros should necessarily be named though. For things like a missing logo it won't be as problematic, but for (say) missing source naming on the list might not be ideal. thanks, kk -- Karl Goetz, (Kamping_Kaiser / VK5FOSS) Debian contributor / gNewSense Maintainer http://www.kgoetz.id.au No, I won't join your social networking group
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature