[ full quote to the benefit of -blends@lists.d.o ] Hi José, thanks for this information. On Sun, Jun 27, 2010 at 06:36:01PM -0500, José Miguel Parrella Romero wrote: > On 2007 I was hired by EDELCA, a power utility in Venezuela, to design > and develop a Debian-based distribution to be used in up to 7,000 PCs > nationwide, due to an internal policy of cost reductions and promotion > of FLOSS usage and development. > > DSLv2 (Distribución de Software Libre) was born as a derivative, with a > copy of the repository (much in a Ubuntu's "universe" fashion) and a > local repository with some 1,000 packages. About 15% of the repository > was developed locally (patches to existing packages, and .deb versions > of non-distributable non-FLOSS non-native packages such as SAP GUI) > > Interesting additions included full LDAP integration with offline PAM > support (nss-db, pam-ccreds), automatic daily updates leveraging a meta > package and integration with two Puppet realms. The distribution ended > up installed in about 2,000 workstations. > > The specific procedures for configuration were documented elsewhere, the > installer was preseeded (fully unattended, based on optical and USB > media due to a very complex network out of our reach) and arguably too > few bugs and/or patches were sent back to Debian. However one of the > employees was mentored by me and devotes some time to Debian. > > EDELCA, the main power utility in the country, and one of the most > important worldwide (operates some of the biggest hydro dams) also uses > Debian server-side in Caracas and Puerto Ordaz, operating mail services > as well as proxies, VPNs, web servers, DNS/DHCP, LDAP servers et al. > > I left EDELCA on 2008 and AFAICT the project was stalled, but there are > lots of users around, and several shortcomings (for example the need of > automatic updating along with Debian) and in my particular opinion such > a small, privately-developed derivative can't survive with 10% or more > of their packaging developed in-house. That is a pity, I think they should consider becoming a Debian Pure Blend, even though I don't know if the changes they performed are reconcilable or not. If EDELCA is interested in pursuing the possibility, they should probably get in touch with debian-derivatives@lists.d.o, which I'm Cc:-ing on this follow-up. > I don't know who is in charge right now, and thus may be a proper point > of contact, but I'm CCing Miguelangel Freitas from the end-user distro > and Víctor Oñate from the Server side. I don't mind being a point of > contact for DSLv2 at this moment. > > The following references are cleverly encrypted in spanish: > > http://blog.bureado.com.ve/?tag=edelca > > http://www.scribd.com/doc/25185349/Experiencias-exitosas-en-el-uso-de-tecnologias-libres-en-EDELCA > http://aulavirtual.edelca.com.ve/ > > http://www.scribd.com/doc/25185232/Diseno-e-implementacion-de-la-Distribucion-de-Software-Libre-basada-en-Debian-de-EDELCA Cheers. -- Stefano Zacchiroli -o- PhD in Computer Science \ PostDoc @ Univ. Paris 7 zack@{upsilon.cc,pps.jussieu.fr,debian.org} -<>- http://upsilon.cc/zack/ Dietro un grande uomo c'è ..| . |. Et ne m'en veux pas si je te tutoie sempre uno zaino ...........| ..: |.... Je dis tu à tous ceux que j'aime
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature