[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Processed: Re: Bug#430822: The acknowledgement mail should contain a http://bugs.debian.org/nnnnnn link to the bug.



On Fri, Jul 20, 2007 at 10:13:31AM +0000, Oleg Verych wrote:
> > Processing commands for control@bugs.debian.org:
> >> reassign 430822 debbugs
> > Bug#430822: The acknowledgement mail should contain a http://bugs.debian.org/nnnnnn link to the bug.
> > Bug reassigned from package `bugs.debian.org' to `debbugs'.
> >
> >> merge 430822 9596 78490 139228 173970 174412 340472 369601 428834 429483
> > Bug#9596: [service.in,process.in] append bug url to the bottom of e-mails sent out
> > Bug#78490: [bugreport.cgi] Add url to the reassignment ack for each bug
> > Bug#139228: debbugs: Include bug URL in notification e-mail
> > Bug#173970: debbugs: Put URL to go straight to bug in acknowledgement emails
> > Bug#174412: bugs.debian.org: Add URL to bug page in BTS in Ack email
> > Bug#340472: bugs.debian.org: Give bug report http url in Acknowledgement email
> > Bug#369601: Please add X-Debian-PR-URL to the mails
> > Bug#428834: Could email messages include a link to relevant pages on bugs.debian.org ?
> > Bug#429483: bugs.debian.org: how to add an url on bug-report into a message body
> > Bug#430822: The acknowledgement mail should contain a http://bugs.debian.org/nnnnnn link to the bug.
> > Bug#407453: please add link to bug page in mail signature
> > Merged 9596 78490 139228 173970 174412 340472 369601 407453 428834 429483 430822.
> >
> >> thanks
> > Stopping processing here.
> 
> Bah. That's why i don't like all that Visual WEB 2.0 AJAX
> implemented in Java(R) using XML boys.

How does simply tacking a plain-text line with the string
"http://bugs.debian.org/nnnnnn"; onto the end of the e-mail, or including
it in an RFC2822 mail header, have anything to do with AJAX, Java, XML,
or any such buzzwords?

I'm not convinced that modifying outgoing e-mail messages is a good
idea, and perhaps a custom header would be better (although note that
lists.debian.org already modifies message bodies with no trouble); I
have no love for XML either, but your attempt to equate it with this set
of bugs is sorely misguided.

-- 
Colin Watson                                       [cjwatson@debian.org]



Reply to: