Re: Bug#202373: traitor offstage
On Mon, 09 Jul 2007, Oleg Verych wrote:
> >> My question is, is `required=4.0' justified? How much score have the
> >> most wired bug report with garbage, as bug info? A wild guess is
> >> -0.0 .. 2.0, but 4.0?
> >
> > The question is at which point the false positives and false negatives
> > are appropriate. The lower the score goes, the more false positives we
> > have, which are more insidious and difficult to deal with than false
> > negatives.
>
> Yes, it seems like very message body independent, but smtp/gmane magic
> dependent...
>
> > X-Spam-Status: No, score=2.1 required=4.0 tests=AWL,FORGED_RCVD_HELO, IMPRONONCABLE_1,MDO_DATING2,SARE_MLB_Stock6,SARE_PROLOSTOCK_SYM3, UNPARSEABLE_RELAY autolearn=no version=3.1.4
> []
> > Original-Received: (from remotemail@localhost) by epsilon.donarmstrong.com (8.13.8/8.13.8/Submit) id l69KC4lS027425 for debian-debbugs@lists.debian.org; Mon, 9 Jul 2007 13:12:04 -0700
>
> | X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.4 required=4.0 tests=LDOSUBSCRIBER, SARE_MLB_Stock6,
> []
> | Original-Received: from flower.upol.cz ([158.194.64.22]) by main.gmane.or
>
I'm not sure what you intend to show by this.
Don Armstrong
--
My spelling ability, or rather the lack thereof, is one of the wonders
of the modern world.
http://www.donarmstrong.com http://rzlab.ucr.edu
Reply to: