Re: Bug#202373: traitor offstage
>> My question is, is `required=4.0' justified? How much score have the
>> most wired bug report with garbage, as bug info? A wild guess is
>> -0.0 .. 2.0, but 4.0?
>
> The question is at which point the false positives and false negatives
> are appropriate. The lower the score goes, the more false positives we
> have, which are more insidious and difficult to deal with than false
> negatives.
Yes, it seems like very message body independent, but smtp/gmane magic
dependent...
> X-Spam-Status: No, score=2.1 required=4.0 tests=AWL,FORGED_RCVD_HELO, IMPRONONCABLE_1,MDO_DATING2,SARE_MLB_Stock6,SARE_PROLOSTOCK_SYM3, UNPARSEABLE_RELAY autolearn=no version=3.1.4
[]
> Original-Received: (from remotemail@localhost) by epsilon.donarmstrong.com (8.13.8/8.13.8/Submit) id l69KC4lS027425 for debian-debbugs@lists.debian.org; Mon, 9 Jul 2007 13:12:04 -0700
| X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.4 required=4.0 tests=LDOSUBSCRIBER, SARE_MLB_Stock6,
[]
| Original-Received: from flower.upol.cz ([158.194.64.22]) by main.gmane.or
> Additionally, Blars Blarson actually examines messages within that
> range and adapts the rules to catch them in the future and deletes
> them from the bugs as appropriate.
>
> So yes, in short, it is justified.
So, hope this info will be helpful. Thanks.
____
Reply to: