[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#344149: marked as done ([owner@bugs.debian.org: Message with no Package: tag cannot be processed! (aptitude don't say "already installed")])

Your message dated Wed, 14 Mar 2007 00:10:39 -0700
with message-id <20070314071039.GZ4070@volo.donarmstrong.com>
and subject line Closing; won't be implemented
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--- Begin Message --- 
Package: Bug Tracking System
Version: ?

It seems your Bug Tracking System is not able to read headers ! I
understand you want a pseudo header after the real header, in the
body, but you could at least check in the header if you don't
find your headers in the body.

----- Forwarded message from Debian Bug Tracking System <owner@bugs.debian.org> -----

Date: Tue, 20 Dec 2005 03:33:01 -0800
From: Debian Bug Tracking System <owner@bugs.debian.org>
To: Olivier Ricou <olivier@ricou.eu.org>
Subject: Message with no Package: tag cannot be processed!
         (aptitude don't say "already installed")

Your message didn't have a Package: line at the start (in the
pseudo-header following the real mail header), or didn't have a
pseudo-header at all.  Your message has been filed under junk but
otherwise ignored.

This makes it much harder for us to categorise and deal with your
problem report. Please _resubmit_ your report to submit@bugs.debian.org
and tell us which package the report is on. For help, check out
http://www.debian.org/Bugs/Reporting.

Your message was dated Tue, 20 Dec 2005 12:22:11 +0100 and had
message-id <20051220112211.GC32211@localhost.localdomain>
and subject aptitude don't say "already installed".
The complete text of it is attached to this message.

If you need any assistance or explanation please contact me.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 20 Dec 2005 11:20:40 +0000
>From ricou@altribe.org Tue Dec 20 03:20:40 2005
Return-path: <ricou@altribe.org>
Received: from shiva.jussieu.fr ([134.157.0.129])
	by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50)
	id 1EofXs-0004X3-0o
	for submit@bugs.debian.org; Tue, 20 Dec 2005 03:20:40 -0800
Received: from mendel.neuromorpho.chups.jussieu.fr (mendel.neuromorpho.chups.jussieu.fr [134.157.204.3])
          by shiva.jussieu.fr (8.13.5/jtpda-5.4) with ESMTP id jBKBKbYB004658
          for <submit@bugs.debian.org>; Tue, 20 Dec 2005 12:20:38 +0100 (CET)
X-Ids: 166
Received: from paon.altribe.org (unknown [192.168.3.1])
	by mendel.neuromorpho.chups.jussieu.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id D41488FB
	for <submit@bugs.debian.org>; Tue, 20 Dec 2005 10:04:16 +0100 (CET)
Received: by paon.altribe.org (Postfix, from userid 1000)
	id 947712578C1; Tue, 20 Dec 2005 12:22:12 +0100 (CET)
Date: Tue, 20 Dec 2005 12:22:11 +0100
From: Olivier Ricou <olivier@ricou.eu.org>
To: submit@bugs.debian.org
Subject: aptitude don't say "already installed"
Message-ID: <20051220112211.GC32211@localhost.localdomain>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
	protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="jho1yZJdad60DJr+"
Content-Disposition: inline
Package: aptitude
Version: 0.2.15.9
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i
X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-1.7.2 (shiva.jussieu.fr [134.157.0.166]); Tue, 20 Dec 2005 12:20:38 +0100 (CET)
X-Antivirus: scanned by sophie at shiva.jussieu.fr
X-Miltered: at shiva.jussieu.fr with ID 43A7E905.003 by Joe's j-chkmail (http://j-chkmail.ensmp.fr)!
Delivered-To: submit@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
	(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=no 
	version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02


--jho1yZJdad60DJr+
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-15
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable


Knowing that I already have xkbutils on my computer :

root@hermes:/var/log # aptitude install xkbutils
Lecture des listes de paquets... Fait
Construction de l'arbre des d=E9pendances... Fait
Reading extended state information
Initializing package states... Fait
The following packages have been kept back:
  kamera kdegraphics-kfile-plugins kooka kpdf ksnapshot ksvg libkpathsea3
  libkscan1 libpoppler0c2 libpoppler0c2-glib
0 packages upgraded, 0 newly installed, 0 to remove and 10 not upgraded.
Need to get 0B of archives. After unpacking 0B will be used.
Writing extended state information... Fait
Lecture des listes de paquets... Fait
Construction de l'arbre des d=E9pendances... Fait
Reading extended state information
Initializing package states... Fait

which is quite long and worste, it does not say that the package is
already installed.=20

apt-get says :

root@hermes:/home/ricou # apt-get install xkbutils
Lecture des listes de paquets... Fait
Construction de l'arbre des d=E9pendances... Fait
xkbutils est d=E9j=E0 la plus r=E9cente version disponible.
0 mis =E0 jour, 0 nouvellement install=E9s, 0 =E0 enlever et 12 non mis =E0
jour.


                                        Olivier.

--jho1yZJdad60DJr+
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: Digital signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFDp+ljXwl5UewLtBARAlw8AJ0dBbTKR6kcuYYT4lKKKK9Q3MUq7wCfQM89
r6pVaRIVcHsrR+wxbyCPiw0=
=HIS3
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--jho1yZJdad60DJr+--


----- End forwarded message -----

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message --- 
Pulling psuedoheaders out of the real headers won't be implemented
because we want to be able to not show useless headers.


Don Armstrong

-- 
"Because," Fee-5 explained patiently, "I was born in the fifth row.
Any fool would understand that, but against stupidity the very Gods
themselves contend in vain."
 -- Alfred Bester _The Computer Connection_ p19

http://www.donarmstrong.com              http://rzlab.ucr.edu

--- End Message ---
Reply to: