tag 184583 moreinfo thanks On Thu, 13 Mar 2003, Gerfried Fuchs wrote: > It would be more than nice to have the BTS setting also a > Mail-Followup-To header in addition to the Reply-To header it > currently sets. This is especially useful for the inital mail sent > to the maintainer, where it more than once happened (not only to me) > that answers to that mail are sent also to submit@bugs because only > the Reply-To header is set (which is a bad thing anyway -- think of > people depending on the Reply-To header to be reachable through it, > I'm not sure if the BTS preserves it or simply overwrites it like > most of those silly mailing lists out there do). I don't understand what setting MFT is going to gain over setting RT; they'd both be set to the same value anyway, and so would have exactly the same problems. As it stands now, replying to the mails as sent by the BTS causes the mail to go to the sender's replyto and the bug itself. [Now, if you're using reply-all, there's little that setting anything is going to do to help.] Don Armstrong -- It was said that life was cheap in Ankh-Morpork. This was, of course, completely wrong. Life was often very expensive; you could get death for free. -- Terry Pratchet _Pyramids_ p25 http://www.donarmstrong.com http://rzlab.ucr.edu
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature