[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: CrossAssassin results

In article <[🔎] 20040409102851.GA482@keid.carnet.hr> joy@srce.hr writes:
>On Thu, Apr 08, 2004 at 09:34:10PM -0700, Blars Blarson wrote:
>> We are getting about 700 nonspam messages a day to the BTS, and about 30
>> spams a day are making it past spamassassin.
>This is reverse from how it's supposed to be used -- the mail should first
>go through CA and only then through SA. Why did you do it the other way

All the messages are going through both crossassassin and
spamassassin.  I'm using the spamassassin score to whitelist messages,
since there are a significant number of non-spam messages that are
sent to four or more bugs.
Blars Blarson			blarson@blars.org
With Microsoft, failure is not an option.  It is a standard feature.

Reply to: