[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: CrossAssassin results



In article <[🔎] 20040409102851.GA482@keid.carnet.hr> joy@srce.hr writes:
>On Thu, Apr 08, 2004 at 09:34:10PM -0700, Blars Blarson wrote:
>> We are getting about 700 nonspam messages a day to the BTS, and about 30
>> spams a day are making it past spamassassin.
>
>This is reverse from how it's supposed to be used -- the mail should first
>go through CA and only then through SA. Why did you do it the other way
>around?

All the messages are going through both crossassassin and
spamassassin.  I'm using the spamassassin score to whitelist messages,
since there are a significant number of non-spam messages that are
sent to four or more bugs.
-- 
Blars Blarson			blarson@blars.org
				http://www.blars.org/blars.html
With Microsoft, failure is not an option.  It is a standard feature.



Reply to: