Re: spam fighting and the bts
On Sun, 4 Apr 2004, Josip Rodin wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 03, 2004 at 04:48:20PM -0800, Blars Blarson wrote:
> > Longer-term, I think spamscan needs to be rewritten to processes
> > multiple messages at a time.
>
> Before that, we could make scripts/receive verify that the mail has a
> destination before bothering spamscan with it. I bet there's a fair bit
> of junk going through spamscan that would have gotten discarded if it
> ever got to processall (and then to service or process).
Actually, the 21000 mails I cleaned yesterday were mostly to valid addresses.
Very few were to invalid bug numbers.
Reply to: