Re: spam fighting and the bts
On Sat, Apr 03, 2004 at 04:48:20PM -0800, Blars Blarson wrote:
> Longer-term, I think spamscan needs to be rewritten to processes
> multiple messages at a time.
Before that, we could make scripts/receive verify that the mail has a
destination before bothering spamscan with it. I bet there's a fair bit
of junk going through spamscan that would have gotten discarded if it
ever got to processall (and then to service or process).
2. That which causes joy or happiness.