On Fri, Nov 07, 2003 at 04:13:24AM +0000, Colin Watson wrote: > I'd recommend that the glibc close/reopen war in question be handled > better from now on. Anthony did say "contact the upstream copyright > holder", and I think it would be a *very good idea* for somebody to do > that instead of further use of control@bugs as a debating stick. It's > not meant to be used that way. There's been much hand-wringing about > what kind of contact might be suitable, but as far as I can see no > actual *action*, so it's all moot. That's really rather disappointing > given the amount of energy otherwise expended on this bug. Jeff said (albeit in Dec 2002) that he talking with upstream about this. Jeff, has there been any progress with upstream as regards the (supposedly non-free) Sun RPC code? -- gram
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature