[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: ANNC: New Debbugs



On Tue, 21 Jan 2003, Ola Lundqvist wrote:

> subscribe bugnr email
>
> and
>
> unsubscribe bugnr email

Already planned.  Some of pts will be no longer needed.

> *) Create packagename@ alias.
>    - When an email gets sent to packagename@bugs.debian.org a bug number
>      is create, just as when sent to submit@.
>      This way a new user would not have to learn to write pseudo headers.
>      The pseudo header can still be accepted but is not needed (i.e. optional)
>      to indicate which package to send to.
>    - submit@ can still be used but is not needed.

Hmm.  Interested idea.  But perhaps those people should use reportbug or bug.

> *) When email is sent to the user and mainainer about a bugnr, the
>    Reply-To: field should be set to bugnr@ only.

Just a matter of editting of templates.

>    - Users who send information about the bug should automatically be subscribed
>      to the bug number.

Er, no.

> >   * Make use of pgp/gpg sigs on mails, to enable various commands.  For
> >     example, this could be used by the Release Manager to tweak certain
> >     tags/status bits, but disallow these commands for others.
> >   * Per email/maintainer/package flags.  This could be used to keep the
> >     acks from being sent(#174503).
>
> That would be a nice thing. The subscription system above would give a
> good infrastructure on this, right? The initial submitter gets an
> acc (when sending to packagename@ and submit@). In the rest of the time
> he/she will get the email back (with some extra text in top/bottom maybe).

What you are discussing and what I am discussing are not related.




Reply to: