Re: birtney changes
Colin Watson wrote:
Mm. I think so. On the one hand, dealing with architectures
independently there would make library transitions even more fluid, and
Mm, I don't think that's the case; leaving a useless libfoo0/i386 around
until libfoo0/m68k is unneeded doesn't make things any harder, unless
something libfoo0/i386 depends on needs to be removed, but that doesn't
On the mutant third hand, it would be easier to see
what's preventing an OOD being removed if those happened
per-architecture, due to the way britney stops reporting uninstallables
at the alphabetically-first architecture.
It'd be easy to change that if you guys want. It'd make things a little
bit slower; but I don't think so much that you'd notice.