Re: custom vs. derivative (Re: packages.gz corrupt, missing packages and other issues)

[Jonas Smedegaard <dr@jones.dk>]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On Tue, Apr 08, 2008 at 05:07:36PM +0200, Holger Levsen wrote:
>> So that part is what we would call CDD from the current definition.
>
>For the purpose of finding a new name and definition, please stop 
>refering to the old one. Write something down (you can very easily do 
>this by using "cp"), call this "your new definition" and then lets 
>discuss this - though I would definitly suggest and prefer if you could 
>change some terms after copying from the old text :-)

I have no interest in redefining.  Only renaming.

I find the current definition satisfactory, but want to promote that 
very definition also to those that have less interest in reading 
definitions or have difficulty interpreting the style in which the 
current definition is written.  That is why I want to rename: to have a 
name that better reflect the current definition.

I also have no interest in naming other designs than that of the current 
definition.

I believe in the current definition.


  - Jonas

- -- 
* Jonas Smedegaard - idealist og Internet-arkitekt
* Tlf.: +45 40843136  Website: http://dr.jones.dk/

  - Enden er nær: http://www.shibumi.org/eoti.htm
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFH+8kOn7DbMsAkQLgRAuOnAJ9cMPXKzYp6W7/T+YAbWtEebZmZOQCfXPFu
VBjn4xgdKpHYAeq8YS7lAp0=
=Tws6
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----