On Fri, 4 Apr 2008, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
And IMO, either something is a Debian Subdistribution or not. Thats quite binary in my opinion :-)
Yes. Either something fits a definition or not. Our task is now to find a reasonable definition for "Debian Subdistribution" write it down and stick to it.
OTOH, I also think something can be called a Debian Subdistribution, even if the aim, to be 100% part of Debian has not been achieved yet. As long as there is this aim and work on this aim is being done.
This is perfectly OK for me and might become a part of the definition.
Good night, and thanks for all the (jelly?)fish!
I think it was definitely no cat (fish). ;-)
Kind regards
Andreas.
--
http://fam-tille.de