Re: [proposal] Simplified junior tags & debtags-based replacement for metapackages
- To: Benjamin Mesing <firstname.lastname@example.org>
- Cc: Debian Junior <email@example.com>, "firstname.lastname@example.org" <email@example.com>, Custom Debian Distributions <firstname.lastname@example.org>
- Subject: Re: [proposal] Simplified junior tags & debtags-based replacement for metapackages
- From: Free Ekanayaka <email@example.com>
- Date: Sun, 09 Apr 2006 12:37:19 +0200
- Message-id: <firstname.lastname@example.org>
- In-reply-to: <20060402170011.GA32671@viaza> (Enrico Zini's message of "Sun, 2 Apr 2006 18:00:11 +0100")
- References: <email@example.com> <Pine.LNX.4.62.0602221655140.20277@wr-linux02> <firstname.lastname@example.org> <Pine.LNX.4.62.0602241202140.29836@wr-linux02> <email@example.com> <20060326114251.GA10145@viaza> <20060327132254.GP6811@A-Eskwadraat.nl> <firstname.lastname@example.org> <1143794545.4810.18.camel@localhost> <email@example.com> <20060402170011.GA32671@viaza>
|--==> Enrico Zini writes:
EZ> On Fri, Mar 31, 2006 at 02:02:09PM +0200, Free Ekanayaka wrote:
>>Definitely I agree, I also think "suite" suites (:)) more than "task",
>>but the clash with dak terminology still holds. Maybe explaining in
>>some document the difference of the two uses of "suite" would be
>>enough to avoid confusion.
EZ> Oh, well, I don't care too much about name clash: they're sometimes
EZ> impossible to avoid. 'tags' was used before debtags (I don't remember
EZ> by what, but it might be mentioned in ) and is now used by the BTS
EZ> usertags. And then you have HTML tags.
EZ> My feeling is that if you want to be unique these days you risk ending
EZ> up with either a long name or a meaningless name.
Fine, let's go for "suite" then.