Re: Examples for CDDtool
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On 05-07-2005 11:31, Sergio Talens-Oliag wrote:
> El Tue, Jul 05, 2005 at 07:44:47AM +0200, Andreas Tille va escriure:
>
>>On Tue, 5 Jul 2005, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
>>
>>
>>>If I understand you correctly, Sergio, the example you gave Andreas was
>>>not meant as a secret but just to avoid confusion while too many things
>>>are still in progress. If so, can I please have the copy as well?
>>
>>Sergio just posted
>>
>> deb-src http://www.lliurex.net/archive llx0509 lliurex
>>
>>in one of his mails.
Oh - I sure searched for it, but mayvbe forgot to put on my glasses :-P
> And, if you want to get the svn code use:
>
> https://mixinet.net/svn/cddtk/trunk
>
> The deb packages are built from that repository using the svn-builpackage
> scripts.
Thanks. That repository I already track (that URL is what Andreas gave
me in Greece). I didn't find the lliurex example there, though.
>>>I shall not complain when things break under my feet, and I shall do my
>>>best to not stall further development with questions (unless you want me
>>>to).
>>
>>You have to beat me first with boring questions and suggestions. ;-)
>
>
> No problem with questions, they are usually useful, and as long as you don't
> mind delayed replies some times.
Ok, great.
(but then I really don't get the reasoning behind your reluctanse to
publishing the example, Sergio)
> I'll upload the latest versions of the cddtk and lliurex-cdd packages later
> this morning, once I verify that the latest version works as I expect.
I'll grab what is there now and check back from time to time.
:-)
- Jonas
- --
* Jonas Smedegaard - idealist og Internet-arkitekt
* Tlf.: +45 40843136 Website: http://dr.jones.dk/
- Enden er nær: http://www.shibumi.org/eoti.htm
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iD8DBQFCylTnn7DbMsAkQLgRAnR5AJ9Tjbkf+IbXIX+AKupZ1Mp+pcv0/gCfVo65
/7/HdJVGKNIV8tBarkiz1vs=
=RwyK
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Reply to: