Re: is jablicator obsolete?
>NOTE: I don't know if you are subscribed to the list and you don't have a
>Mail-Followup-To header, that's why I'm replying to both addresses.
I am subscribed.
>The CDD model we all have is a little bit different because the idea is to
>build multiple tasks with configuration data and your tool is more like a
>clonning system, isn't it?
>Anyway I see an interesting application for your system... use it to
>generate an extra *task* for an installation of one or more CDDs that
>includes all the packages that have been installed by hand by the user.
I don't completely understand, but that's ok. I'll leave jablicator in
place until someone tells me it is obsolete.