[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Proposal to change to SVN

 || On Tue, 22 Jun 2004 16:38:08 -0300
 || Ben Armstrong <synrg@sanctuary.nslug.ns.ca> wrote: 

	ba> On Tue, 2004-06-22 at 16:26, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote:
	>> I believe arch should be considered as well, when one decide if the
	>> version control system should be changed.  Being able to do off-line
	>> commits is a good thing. :)

	ba> I must defer to the better judgement of those who have had experience
	ba> with each.  All I know about either is second-hand.  I have heard lots
	ba> of good reports about Subversion, but very little (good or bad) about
	ba> Arch, so I'll need lots of convincing to cast my vote with Arch.

        Looking today at internet I found a really interesting tool:

        This add the decentralized version control system to

        Really interesting.

        O T A V I O    S A L V A D O R
 E-mail: otavio@debian.org      UIN: 5906116
 GNU/Linux User: 239058     GPG ID: 49A5F855
 Home Page: http://www.freedom.ind.br/otavio
"Microsoft gives you Windows ... Linux gives
 you the whole house."

Attachment: pgpaX1awHVL5D.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Reply to: