Re: DPA instead of PPA
On Thu, 9 May 2013 12:40:28 +0100, Justin wrote in message
<20130509114028.GA1750@xibalba.demon.co.uk>:
> Jacob Wilk wrote:
> > * Raphael Hertzog <hertzog@debian.org>, 2013-05-09, 08:38:
> >>> I actually really like this idea! (Though I suggest "Debian
> >>> Personal Archive".)
> >>>
> >>> It's really different from what people know as PPAs.
> >>
> >> To be fair, "Personal" is probably not relevant either. I expect
> >> many of those repositories to be maintained by teams.
> >>
> >> DSPA = Debian Special Purpose Archive
> >> DSPR = Debian Special Purpose Repository
> >> DASP = Debian Archive of Special Packages
> >> SPA = Special Package Archive
> >
> > You forgot the most catchy:
> >
> > DSA = Debian Special Archive
>
> Or a portmanteau instead of an initialism: SUP(plementary re)POSITORY.
...and the Optional SOUP... ;o)
--
..med vennlig hilsen = with Kind Regards from Arnt Karlsen
...with a number of polar bear hunters in his ancestry...
Scenarios always come in sets of three:
best case, worst case, and just in case.
Reply to: