Re: DPA instead of PPA
Jacob Wilk wrote:
> * Raphael Hertzog <email@example.com>, 2013-05-09, 08:38:
>>> I actually really like this idea! (Though I suggest "Debian Personal
>>> It's really different from what people know as PPAs.
>> To be fair, "Personal" is probably not relevant either. I expect many
>> of those repositories to be maintained by teams.
>> DSPA = Debian Special Purpose Archive
>> DSPR = Debian Special Purpose Repository
>> DASP = Debian Archive of Special Packages
>> SPA = Special Package Archive
> You forgot the most catchy:
> DSA = Debian Special Archive
Or a portmanteau instead of an initialism: SUP(plementary re)POSITORY.
DSA is debian-sys-anal, right?