Re: Considerations for lilo removal
How many times do I have to tell you people. The ONLY TRUE editor in pico (or nano at the very least). Everything else is bloatware. Oh, and by the way: The onyl true language is C. If you can't do it in C, then it can't (or shouldn't) be done.
On 6/19/08, Bernd Zeimetz <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
> Geez. You guys get this wrong all the time. The right tool for the
> right job! If you think vi(m) / emacs would be best at it, rock on.
> It's all up to you.
No. Even if emacs would be better, you should use vim.
> Me, I use both of the real true editors, and enjoy them for their
> respective strengths.
> And as apps go, emacs isn't the bloated hawg it once was. That's kde
> and gnome now. Though (g)vim's attempting to get there too.
KDE is to gome like vim is to emacs.
Bernd Zeimetz Debian GNU/Linux Developer
GPG Fingerprint: 06C8 C9A2 EAAD E37E 5B2C BE93 067A AD04 C93B FF79
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-curiosa-REQUEST@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact email@example.com