Re: Public request that action be taken at whoever abused their technical power to remove me from the kernel team at alioth.
On Tue, May 29, 2007 at 11:13:11AM -0400, Kevin Mark wrote:
> On Tue, May 29, 2007 at 04:52:03PM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
> > On Tue, May 29, 2007 at 04:29:50PM +0200, Mike Hommey wrote:
> > > On Tue, May 29, 2007 at 04:17:53PM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
> > > > Ok, then we come back to the problem of Frans, right, who found it
> > > > totally unacceptable that i dared to present myself as DPL, and chose to
> > > > hurry to search expulsion supporters to punish me for it ?
> > >
> > > Sven, could you "slide" back to your own parallel world, and send back the
> > > yourself from this world, please ?
> >
> > Mike, i ask you to look at the expulsion details, i will sent them to
> > you if you have not otherwise access, and look at the evidence found
> > there, how At least two people said something replied to Frans, where
> > they replied before the deadline was over, which makes it evident that
> > it was frans who was one of the motors of the expulsion supporters
> > searchers. Then you look at the date of the expulsion request, go back 2
> > weeks, and see it is the day after my DPL candidacy.
> >
> > Then, you tell me at that time, a week into february, what could
> > possibly be reproached to me and justify a renewed expulsion request ?
> >
> >From my point of view, your words are less important that your actions
> and what happended in the past is less important that what you are doing
> now. You are just trying to be 'right' at any expense by beating up
> everyone else wheather they were involved in the events or not. You
Am i ? I am just using a public forum for speaking about my issue, since
doing it in the private has so severly failed in the past. I am holding
an open an transparent discussion with those who i hope may be moved to
solve this in a fair and honourable way.
I don't see how you can equate writing mails in a single list, on a set
of well defined threads, as "beating up everyone". I mean, then half the
DDs who engage in random flamewars on random lists would be coupable of
the same thing as me, and should be suspended for a year ?
And i did indeed see, and skipped, many such flamewars, just look at
your mailbox or your mail archive ?
> obviously have not seen the 'subversion guys talk at google about
> poisonous people'. In life you can 'be right' or 'be happy'. You choose
No i have not, and i find it a bit insulting to be treated as a
poinsonous people, or a energy beast, as other have called me. This is
typical of the deshumanizing of the other party in this dispute, and
hardly prone to help solve this.
> 'being right' and the result is not being 'happy'. And your attacks on
Sure, i have tried the 'ignore it and be happy', saddly the other party
could not be satisfied by this, and repeteadly restarted the agression
while nothing could be reproached to me.
I defy you or anyone to find a single reason to justify the renewal of
the expulsion procedure at the start of february, or the hallucinating
'two month ban' after christmas.
> Debian are a substitute for something else that makes you unhappy. And
No, you are wrong. Debian is the one making me unhappy, is the one
hurting me, and no substitute for anything else. That is the problem,
because the DDs fail to aknowledge the part of responsability they have
in this mess in having it let escalate to such dramatic proportions.
> that issue can not be solved by attacking folks here.
> Please find a way to resolve your sadness by seeking therapy.
Yeah, thanks. I wonder what psychological degree you have to be able to
make such a diagnostic with the highly partial data you have in your
possession. You must be a hell of a psychanalist :)
Saddened,
Sven Luther
Reply to: